What is Propitiation?
Over the years, I’ve heard many professing Christians wrongfully tell other Christians that the word propitiation in the Bible is not important to tell others about, nor to expound on. I’ve even been told by a few that I should never preach on propitiation while heralding the Gospel in the streets (as I did here). I don’t believe it’s necessary to say the word “propitiation” while evangelizing, but propitiation is a top-shelf doctrine, and the doctrine of propitiation is an important part of the atoning sacrifice, which is an essential part of the Gospel. Frankly, if your sins have not been propitiated and expiated, you are surely hellbound.
So, if someone were to ask me to give an impromptu definition of propitiation, my response would be at least this.
In summary1, propitiation is when Christ fully appeases, satisfies, or placates the wrath of an angry God on behalf of His elect, as He atones for their sins and reconciles them to the Father. Christ paid their sin debt and the penalty that was due. He pardons them, setting them free from sin.
OK, I have defined the word propitiation, so you could stop right here. Or, if you choose to dive deeper, for a more technical definition of propitiation, then go with me further.
Propitiation is seen in many places in the Scriptures. Below are a few of many verses, along with their English translations from the Greek. Take note, there is much exclusivity in Christ’s propitiatory and expiatory work, as His atonement was limited to His elect only.
Luke 18:13, “And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.”
This “be merciful” is the Greek word Hilaskomai, Strong’s #2433: This means to conciliate, i.e. (transitively) to atone for (sin), or (intransitively) be propitious: To be merciful, to make reconciliation for. To render propitious, to expiate, to make an atonement or expiation for (Heb. 2:17). To be gracious, to show mercy, to pardon. Also, from Strong’s #2436 & #2661.
Romans 3:25, “Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;”
This “to be a propitiation” is the Greek word Hilastērion, Strong’s #2435: This is a means for propitiation or a place for expiation. An expiatory (place or thing), an appeasing or expiating, having placating or expiating force, a means of appeasing or expiating, an atoning victim or sacrifice, or (specially) the lid of the Ark (in the Temple). A -mercy seat, or a propitiation (also a derivative of #2433).
1 John 4:10, “Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.
This “to be the propitiation” is the Greek word Hilasmos, Strong’s #2434: This means an appeasement necessitated by sin, expiation. An instrument for appeasing, a sacrifice to atone, a sin-offering. An atonement, i.e., an expiator for propitiation (also from #2662 & #2434).
Below are some excellent published definitions of propitiation, from men much smarter than I.
“Propitiation. That by which God is rendered propitious, i.e., by which it becomes consistent with his character and government to pardon and bless the sinner. The propitiation does not procure his love or make him loving; it only renders it consistent for him to exercise his love towards sinners.
In Rom. 3:25 and Heb. 9:5 (A.V., “mercy-seat”) the Greek word hilasterion is used. It is the word employed by the LXX. translators in Ex. 25:17 and elsewhere as the equivalent for the Hebrew kapporeth, which means “covering,” and is used of the lid of the ark of the covenant (Ex. 25:21; 30:6). This Greek word (hilasterion) came to denote not only the mercy-seat or lid of the ark, but also propitiation or reconciliation by blood. On the great day of atonement the high priest carried the blood of the sacrifice he offered for all the people within the veil and sprinkled with it the “mercy-seat,” and so made propitiation.
In 1 John 2:2; 4:10, Christ is called the “propitiation for our sins.” Here, a different Greek word is used (hilasmos). Christ is “the propitiation,” because by his becoming our substitute and assuming our obligations, he expiated our guilt, covered it, by the vicarious punishment which he endured. (Comp. Heb. 2:17, where the expression “make reconciliation” of the A.V. is more correctly in the R.V. “make propitiation.”)”
M. G. Easton, Illustrated Bible Dictionary and Treasury of Biblical History, Biography, Geography, Doctrine, and Literature (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1893), 563.
“Propitiation. The satisfaction of God’s just wrath toward sinners, accomplished through the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ. Many Reformed theologians consider this *doctrine to be a necessary element for understanding how the *atonement, as *penal substitution, makes possible Christ’s propitiation for sins by dying in the place of sinners. This view is not intended to portray God the Father as full of wrath, in contrast to the loving Son who pacifies his angry Father; rather, it is because of God’s love for the world that the Father sent his Son to be the propitiation for *sin. By this means, God is both “just and the justifier,” preserving his holiness and love without compromising his character.”
Kelly M. Kapic and Wesley Vander Lugt, Pocket Dictionary of the Reformed Tradition, The IVP Pocket Reference Series (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2013), 91.
I have more dictionary definitions in comments below.
This post is part of a What Is series I’m working on.
____________________________________
- My summarized definition of propitiation was gleaned from research of various dictionaries, encyclopedias, lexicons, as well as various academic writings. Including but not limited to.
William D. Mounce, Mounce’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old & New Testament Words (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2006), 1173.
Concise Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).
Alexander Souter, A Pocket Lexicon to the Greek New Testament (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1917), 115–116.
M. G. Easton, Illustrated Bible Dictionary and Treasury of Biblical History, Biography, Geography, Doctrine, and Literature (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1893), 563.
Thomas Nelson Publishers, eds., Nelson’s New Illustrated Bible Dictionary (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1995).
Marvin Richardson Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament, vol. 2 (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1887), 325–326.
Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 1999), 96.
Inc Merriam-Webster, Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. (Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc., 2003).
Gregg R. Allison, “Propitiation,” in The Baker Compact Dictionary of Theological Terms (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books: A Division of Baker Publishing Group, 2016), 174.
Kelly M. Kapic and Wesley Vander Lugt, Pocket Dictionary of the Reformed Tradition, The IVP Pocket Reference Series (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2013), 91.
J. D. Douglas, Peter Toon, and Walter A. Elwell, eds., “Propitiation,” in The Concise Dictionary of the Christian Tradition: Doctrine, Liturgy, History (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2023), 308.
C. H. Dodd, The Bible and the Greeks, 1935; R. Nicole, WTJ 17, 1954–5, pp. 117–157; Leon Morris, NTS 2, 1955–6, pp. 33–43; idem, The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross2, 1965; H.-G. Link, C. Brown, H. Vorländer, NIDNTT 3, pp. 145–176.
L. L. Morris, “Propitiation,” in New Bible Dictionary, ed. D. R. W. Wood et al. (Leicester, England; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996), 975–976.
Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words (Nashville, TN: T. Nelson, 1996), 493–494.
Jeremiah H. Russell, “Expiation, Propitiation,” in Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary, ed. Chad Brand et al. (Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers, 2003), 533–534.
The Concise Dictionary of Christian Theology (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2001), 63. ↩︎
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Another definition, this one from The New Bible Dictionary.
.
PROPITIATION. Propitiation properly signifies the removal of wrath by the offering of a gift. In the OT it is expressed by the verb kipper (*ATONEMENT). In the NT the hilaskomai word group is the important one. In modern times the whole idea of propitiation has been strongly criticized as savouring of unworthy ideas of God. Many suggest that the term ‘propitiation’ should be abandoned in favour of *EXPIATION, and this is done, for example, in RSV.
.
The objection to propitiation arises largely from an objection to the whole idea of the wrath of God, which many exponents of this view relegate to the status of an archaism. They feel that modern men cannot hold such an idea. But the men of the OT had no such inhibitions. For them ‘God is angry with the wicked every day’ (Ps. 7:11, AV). They had no doubt that sin inevitably arouses the strongest reaction from God. God is not to be accused of moral flabbiness. He is vigorously opposed to evil in every shape and form while he may be ‘slow to anger’ (Ne. 9:17, etc.), his anger is yet certain in the face of sin. We may even read ‘The Lord is slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love, forgiving iniquity and transgression, but he will by no means clear the guilty’ (Nu. 14:18). Even in a passage dealing with the longsuffering of God his refusal to condone guilt finds mention. The thought that God is slow to anger is to men of the OT far from being a truism. It is something wonderful and surpassing. It is awe-inspiring and totally unexpected.
But if they were sure of the wrath of God against all sin, they were equally sure that this wrath might be put away, usually by the offering of the appropriate sacrifice. This was ultimately due, not to any efficacy in the sacrifice, but to God himself. God says, ‘I have given it for you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls’ (Lv. 17:11). Pardon is not something wrung from an unwilling deity. It is the gracious gift of a God who is eager to forgive. So the psalmist can say, ‘He, being compassionate, forgave their iniquity, and did not destroy them; he restrained his anger often, and did not stir up all his wrath’ (Ps. 78:38). The averting of the wrath of God is not something which men bring about. It is due to none less than God himself, who ‘turned his anger away’ (AV).
.
In the NT there are several passages where the expression ‘the wrath of God’ occurs, but the relevant evidence is not limited to these alone. Everywhere in the NT there is the thought that God is vigorously opposed to evil. The sinner is in no good case. He has put himself in the wrong with God. He can look for nothing other than the severity of the divine judgment. Whether we choose to call this ‘the wrath of God’ or not, it is there. And, while wrath is a term to which some objections may legitimately be raised, it is the biblical term and no satisfactory substitute has been suggested.
.
We see the force of the NT idea of propitiation from the occurrence of the term in Rom. 3:24f. We are ‘justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood’ (AV). The force of Paul’s argument up to this point is that all, Jew and Gentile alike, are under the condemnation of God. ‘The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and wickedness of men’ (Rom. 1:18). Paul shows first that the Gentile world stands under God’s condemnation and then that the Jewish world is in the same plight. It is against this background that he sees the work of Christ. Christ did not save men from nothing at all. He delivered them from a very real peril. The sentence of judgment had been passed against them. The wrath of God hung over them. Paul has strongly emphasized the wrath of God throughout these opening chapters, and therefore Christ’s saving work must include deliverance from this wrath. This deliverance is described by the word ‘propitiation’. There is nothing else to express this thought in the critical passage Rom. 3:21ff., which sets out the way in which God has dealt with this aspect of man’s plight. hilastērion must be held here to signify something very like ‘propitiation’. (See further NTS 2, 1955–6, pp. 33–43.)
.
In 1 Jn. 2:2 Jesus is described as ‘the propitiation for our sins’. In the previous verse he is our ‘advocate with the Father’. If we need an advocate with God, then our position is indeed a dangerous one. We are in dire peril. All this helps us to see that ‘propitiation’ is to be taken here in its usual sense. Jesus’ activity for men is described as turning away the divine wrath.
But the Bible view of propitiation does not depend on this or that specific passage. It is a reflection of the general import of its teaching. ‘Propitiation’ is a reminder that God is implacably opposed to everything that is evil, that his opposition may properly be described as ‘wrath’, and that this wrath is put away only by the atoning work of Christ.
.
BIBLIOGRAPHY. C. H. Dodd, The Bible and the Greeks, 1935; R. Nicole, WTJ 17, 1954–5, pp. 117–157; Leon Morris, NTS 2, 1955–6, pp. 33–43; idem, The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross2, 1965; H.-G. Link, C. Brown, H. Vorländer, NIDNTT 3, pp. 145–176.
L. L. MORRIS.
.
L. L. Morris, “Propitiation,” in New Bible Dictionary, ed. D. R. W. Wood et al. (Leicester, England; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996), 975–976.
Another definition, this one from Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary.
.
PROPITIATION
A. Verb.
.
hilaskomai (ἱλάσκομαι, 2433) was used amongst the Greeks with the significance “to make the gods propitious, to appease, propitiate,” inasmuch as their good will was not conceived as their natural attitude, but something to be earned first. This use of the word is foreign to the Greek Bible, with respect to God whether in the Sept. or in the NT. It is never used of any act whereby man brings God into a favorable attitude or gracious disposition. It is God who is “propitiated” by the vindication of His holy and righteous character, whereby through the provision He has made in the vicarious and expiatory sacrifice of Christ, He has so dealt with sin that He can show mercy to the believing sinner in the removal of his guilt and the remission of his sins.
.
Thus in Luke 18:13 it signifies “to be propitious” or “merciful to” (with the person as the object of the verb), and in Heb. 2:17 “to expiate, to make propitiation for” (the object of the verb being sins); here the RV,“to make propitiation” is an important correction of the KJV “to make reconciliation.” Through the “propitiatory” sacrifice of Christ, he who believes upon Him is by God’s own act delivered from justly deserved wrath, and comes under the covenant of grace.
.
Never is God said to be reconciled, a fact itself indicative that the enmity exists on man’s part alone, and that it is man who needs to be reconciled to God, and not God to man. God is always the same and, since He is Himself immutable, His relative attitude does change towards those who change. He can act differently towards those who come to Him by faith, and solely on the ground of the “propitiatory” sacrifice of Christ, not because He has changed, but because He ever acts according to His unchanging righteousness.
.
The expiatory work of the Cross is therefore the means whereby the barrier which sin interposes between God and man is broken down. By the giving up of His sinless life sacrificially, Christ annuls the power of sin to separate between God and the believer.
.
In the OT the Hebrew verb kaphar is connected with kopher, “a covering” (see MERCY SEAT), and is used in connection with the burnt offering, e.g., Lev. 1:4; 14:20; 16:24, the guilt offering, e.g., Lev. 5:16, 18, the sin offering, e.g., Lev. 4:20, 26, 31, 35, the sin offering and burnt offering together, e.g., Lev. 5:10; 9:7, the meal offering and peace offering, e.g., Ezek. 45:15, 17, as well as in other respects. It is used of the ram offered at the consecration of the high priest, Ex. 29:33, and of the blood which God gave upon the altar to make “propitiation” for the souls of the people, and that because “the life of the flesh is in the blood,” Lev. 17:11, and “it is the blood that maketh atonement by reason of the life” (RV). Man has forfeited his life on account of sin and God has provided the one and only way whereby eternal life could be bestowed, namely, by the voluntary laying down of His life by His Son, under divine retribution. Of this the former sacrifices appointed by God were foreshadowings.
.
B. Nouns.
1. hilasterion (ἱλαστήριον, 2435), akin to A, is regarded as the neuter of an adjective signifying “propitiatory.” In the Sept. it is used adjectivally in connection with epithema, “a cover,” in Exod. 25:17 and 37:6, of the lid of the ark (see MERCY SEAT), but it is used as a noun (without epithema), of locality, in Exod. 25:18, 19, 20, 21, 22; 31:7; 35:12; 37:7, 8, 9; Lev. 16:2, 13, 14, 15; Num. 7:89, and this is its use in Heb. 9:5.
.
Elsewhere in the NT it occurs in Rom. 3:25, where it is used of Christ Himself; the RV text and punctuation in this verse are important: “whom God set forth to be a propitiation, through faith, by His blood.” The phrase “by His blood” is to be taken in immediate connection with “propitiation.” Christ, through His expiatory death, is the personal means by whom God shows the mercy of His justifying grace to the sinner who believes. His “blood” stands for the voluntary giving up of His life, by the shedding of His blood in expiatory sacrifice under divine judgment righteously due to us as sinners, faith being the sole condition on man’s part.
.
Note: “By metonymy, ‘blood’ is sometimes put for ‘death,’ inasmuch as, blood being essential to life, Lev. 17:11, when the blood is shed life is given up, that is, death takes place. The fundamental principle on which God deals with sinners is expressed in the words ‘apart from shedding of blood,’ i.e., unless a death takes place, ‘there is no remission’ of sins, Heb. 9:22.
.
“But whereas the essential of the type lay in the fact that blood was shed, the essential of the antitype lies in this, that the blood shed was that of Christ. Hence, in connection with Jewish sacrifices, ‘the blood’ is mentioned without reference to the victim from which it flowed, but in connection with the great antitypical sacrifice of the NT the words ‘the blood’ never stand alone; the One Who shed the blood is invariably specified, for it is the Person that gives value to the work; the saving efficacy of the Death depends entirely upon the fact that He Who died was the Son of God.”*
.
2. hilasmos (ἱλασμός, 2434), akin to hileos (“merciful, propitious”), signifies “an expiation, a means whereby sin is covered and remitted.” It is used in the NT of Christ Himself as “the propitiation,” in 1 John 2:2 and 4:10, signifying that He Himself, through the expiatory sacrifice of His death, is the personal means by whom God shows mercy to the sinner who believes on Christ as the One thus provided. In the former passage He is described as “the propitiation for our sins; and not for ours only, but also for the whole world.” The italicized addition in the KJV, “the sins of,ʷ gives a wrong interpretation. What is indicated is that provision is made for the whole world, so that no one is, by divine predetermination, excluded from the scope of God’s mercy; the efficacy of the “propitiation,” however, is made actual for those who believe. In 4:10, the fact that God “sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins,” is shown to be the great expression of God’s love toward man, and the reason why Christians should love one another.¶ In the Sept., Lev. 25:9; Num. 5:8; 1 Chron. 28:20; Ps. 130:4; Ezek. 44:27; Amos 8:14.¶
.
W. E. Vine, Merrill F. Unger, and William White Jr., Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words (Nashville, TN: T. Nelson, 1996), 493–494.